{"id":3903,"date":"2026-06-25T13:34:56","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T11:34:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/?p=3903"},"modified":"2026-06-25T13:36:29","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T11:36:29","slug":"flying-driving-or-taking-the-train","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/en\/2026\/06\/25\/flying-driving-or-taking-the-train\/","title":{"rendered":"Flying, driving or taking the train?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>With the holidays just round the corner, the question arises: shall we fly? For most climate activists, it\u2019s a no-brainer, but we do occasionally get asked this by family or friends. Someone might say, for example, that it\u2019s better to fly to Barcelona than to drive there. Here\u2019s what the Klimaatwiki has to say on the subject, on <a href=\"https:\/\/klimaatwiki.org\/index.php\/Desinformatie_debunken_en_%27prebunken%27\">the page \u2018Debunking and \u201cpre-bunking\u201d misinformation\u2019<\/a> (in Dutch).<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For references, see footnotes in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/2026\/06\/24\/vliegen-auto-of-trein\/\">Dutch version of this post<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Is flying to Barcelona better for the climate than travelling by car?<\/h2>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"alignleft size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"360\" height=\"233\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1978.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3925\" style=\"width:158px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1978.png 360w, https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1978-300x194.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 360px) 100vw, 360px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Flying is the most polluting mode of transport. The claim that flying is better than travelling by car usually stems from a comparison of emissions per person on a long journey. A full or fuel-efficient passenger aeroplane may emit less CO\u2082 per passenger than someone driving alone in an average car over the same route. However, this result does not always hold true \u2013 it depends heavily on the distance, the load factor, the vehicle\u2019s fuel efficiency and whether the journey is a short or long flight. [1]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What the science says<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Flying is almost always the most polluting form of transport \u2014 both in terms of CO\u2082 emissions and emissions of other harmful substances \u2014 with the greatest impact on the climate. Travelling by train is by far the best option for the climate \u2014 even better than travelling by car.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-base-background-color has-background\">Climate myth<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-base-background-color has-background wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s better to fly to Barcelona than to drive, as you\u2019ll emit less CO\u2082. Claims like this are sometimes made in the media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">More facts and explanations<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The website Our World in Data [2] provides an overview of carbon emissions per kilometre travelled. This shows that flying and driving are by far the most polluting modes of transport.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Travelling by train is a particularly low-carbon way of travelling. If you take the train instead of the car for medium-distance journeys, this would reduce emissions by around 80 per cent. If you take the train instead of a domestic flight, this would reduce your emissions by around 86 per cent.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"922\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1967-1024x922.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3915\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1967-1024x922.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1967-300x270.png 300w, https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1967-768x692.png 768w, https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1967-1536x1383.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/IMG_1967-2048x1844.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO\u2082eq) per passenger per kilometre. This also takes into account the effect of increased global warming caused by aviation emissions at high altitudes. Source: Our World in Data. [3] Note: Domestic flights of less than 1,000 km score higher than short international flights. This is because take-off and climb \u2013 the most fuel-intensive phase \u2013 account for a relatively large proportion of the flight.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The data is taken from a UK government report. [4] It corresponds well with figures provided by other sources, such as Terrapass, [5] the University of Manchester\u2019s Carbon Savings Tool [6] or the ICAO\u2019s Carbon Emissions Calculator. [7]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Emissions from air travel are often measured per passenger-kilometre, not per aircraft. Because an aeroplane carries many people, the emissions are spread across more passengers, making a flight on some long routes appear more favourable than a solo car journey. One source cites, for example, a return flight from New York to Los Angeles, where emissions per passenger are lower than when travelling alone in an average car. [1]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Where the comparison no longer holds true<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For short journeys, driving is often better, especially if there is more than one person in the car. The BBC summary [8] notes that petrol or diesel cars perform better than flying in many cases, and that adding just one extra passenger can tip the balance in favour of driving. Electric cars, trains and buses can alter the comparison even further.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">People often hear a simplified version of a more specific statement: \u201cFlying can result in lower emissions than driving alone on some long journeys in a relatively inefficient car.\u201d This is shortened to \u201cflying is better for the climate than driving\u201d, which is misleading because it does not take into account the number of passengers and the length of the journey. A more accurate rule is that <strong>travelling alone in a petrol car is sometimes worse, but carpooling or driving efficiently is often better<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Carbon offsetting<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some airlines offer CO\u2082 offsetting for their flights. You pay an additional fee, which is spent on projects that capture CO\u2082 emissions, for example by planting trees. Ultimately, this is not a solution to the climate crisis: to tackle that, CO\u2082 emissions must be reduced \u2014 and the measure proven to be most effective is to stop burning fossil fuels. CO\u2082 offsetting does not reduce CO\u2082 emissions. <a href=\"https:\/\/klimaatwiki.org\/index.php\/Mitigatie#Koolstofcompensaties_(Carbon_offsets)\">Read more about CO\u2082 offsettin<\/a>g in the Klimaatwiki.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Calculation<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To compare flying to Barcelona with travelling by car, we use data from Our World in Data. The distance as the crow flies (by air) is 1,200 km and by road it is 1,500 km.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A single-leg flight produces 1,200 \u00d7 151 = 181,200 g = 181 kg of CO\u2082 per passenger. Travelling alone in a petrol car produces 1,500 \u00d7 170 = 255,000 g = 255 kg of CO\u2082 per passenger. Travelling as a pair in a car produces 127.5 kg of CO\u2082 per passenger, which is already less harmful than flying. Electric cars, trains and buses produce even lower emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Various emissions calculators produce similar results. [1 9 10] The figures vary \u2014 depending on the choice of data sources \u2014 but the ratios between the different modes of transport are roughly the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With the holidays just round the corner, the question arises: shall we fly? For most climate activists, it\u2019s a no-brainer, but we do occasionally get asked this by family or friends. Someone might say, for example, that it\u2019s better to fly to Barcelona than to drive there. Here\u2019s what the Klimaatwiki has to say on &#8230; <a title=\"Flying, driving or taking the train?\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/en\/2026\/06\/25\/flying-driving-or-taking-the-train\/\" aria-label=\"Lees meer over Flying, driving or taking the train?\">Lees verder<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":3892,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":true,"iawp_total_views":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-klimaatwiki"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3903"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3903\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3930,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3903\/revisions\/3930"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3892"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scientistrebellion.nl\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}